Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya, Saiful Anwar General Hospital, Malang, East Java, Indonesia

2 Departement of Nursery, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia

3 Departement of Biology, Mathematics and Nature Science Faculty, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia

4 Doctoral Program in Medical Science, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia

Abstract

Background: COVID-19 pandemic has high incidence and mortality, including in Indonesia. One of the prevention efforts is the provision of vaccines, but the ageing of the immune system (immunosenescence) may reduce the immune response to vaccination. Studies reported the decline of interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) could be one of markers of immune cell ageing. Besides, the increases soluble CD28 (sCD28) reported has good correlation with membrane CD28 (mCD28), thus it could be used as an alternative marker for immunosenescence.
Objective: To determine the differences in levels of sCD28, IFN-γ and anti-S-RBD antibodies in the group suspected of having an ageing immune system with the control group after vaccination.
Methods: Sample consisted of 24 control (healthy adult) and 32 case (elderly and adult with comorbid) subjects. Blood samples were examined for anti-S-RBD antibody, IFN-γ, and sCD28 levels. Analysis of data performed by Median test and Spearman tests.
Results: Mean level of anti-S-RBD antibodies, IFN-γ, and sCD28 in case group compared to control group was 33.0 ±17.47 BAU/mL vs. 45.97 ± 23.13 BAU/mL (p = 0.007); 41.61 ± 38.79 ng/mL vs. 98.59 ± 94.31 ng/mL (p = 0.007); and 3.80 ± 3.68 ng/mL vs. 7.81 ± 7.97 ng/mL (p = 0.280), respectively. The anti-S-RBD antibodies and IFN-γ levels are lower in case group and sCD28 is lower in case group although not statistically significant.
Conclusion: Anti-S-RBD antibodies after COVID-19 vaccination are lower in elderly or comorbid people than in adults without comorbid because of ageing of immune system.

Graphical Abstract

Effect of Immune Cell Ageing on Humoral Immunity Responses Post-COVID-19 Vaccination

Keywords

Introduction

COVID-19 is a disease caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2 (SARS CoV-2), which is a worldwide pandemic. Symptoms experienced by each infected person vary significantly from no symptoms, mild, moderate to severe symptoms [1]. The absence of effective drugs for COVID-19 has prompted the rapid development of vaccines that are considered capable of preventing the spread of COVID-19, although in people with ageing of immune system there is possibility that the vaccine will be less effective [2-4]. In Indonesia, COVID-19 mortality is still high especially in older people. Research by Surendra et al. found that mortality of people ≥ 70 years old was 21% and increased if they had two or more comorbidities (51%) [5]. To control the pandemic in Indonesia, the government imported COVID-19 vaccine from Sinovac Life, CoronaVac, and it administered first for people with high risk to spread COVID-19 (medical staff, people that work in public services) or people with high risk of mortality and morbidity in COVID-19 (older people) [6].

CoronaVac (Sinovac Life Sciences, Beijing, China) is an inactivated virus-based vaccine administered to most Indonesians. A study in China reported that vaccination with Sinovac produced 92% neutralizing antibodies after four weeks and peaked at 6-8 weeks. Adverse events from Sinovac were seen in 29% of participants without severe circumstances, which indicates that the vaccine is relatively safe [7].

 Several innate and adaptive immune cells respond to SARS-CoV-2, such as alveolar macrophages, dendritic cells, neutrophils, and lymphocytes [8-10]. The immune response to administration of the Sinovac vaccine is analogous to the natural response when SARS-CoV-2 enters the host's body through the Angiotensin Converting Enzyme (ACE)-2 receptor [11-13]. Viruses in host cells are recognized as damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPS) and pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) by alveolar macrophages. Furthermore, macrophages induce an effector mechanism played by B lymphocyte cells, which can secrete antibodies and bind specifically to pathogens. Cytotoxic T cells limit virus spread, and helper T cells secrete specific anti-viral cytokines [14,1 5].

There are four structural proteins in SARS-CoV-2, namely S (spike), N (nucleocapsid), M (membrane), and E (envelop) proteins. Protein S is one of the targets for developing vaccines to form antibodies against the receptor-binding domain (RBD) protein S to prevent the virus entry into host cells and protect against Coronavirus infection [16-18].

Some considerations in assessing the vaccination success are the formation of humoral immune responses and cellular immune responses to viruses that appear after vaccination. The evaluation of humoral immune response after vaccination is essential to assess the production of neutralizing antibodies. Neutralizing antibodies are antibodies that can inhibit the interaction between SARS-CoV-2 and the ACE-2 receptor, thereby effectively preventing the SARS-CoV-2 entry into the host. Anti-S-RBD is currently used to evaluate the neutralizing antibody [19-21].

Many factors influence the formation of post-vaccination antibodies, one of which is the immune system ageing. Immune ageing is found commonly in older people, but it can be found in many conditions, such as patients with autoimmune diseases, chronic infections, malignancies, and other inflammatory diseases, that accelerate immune ageing (premature ageing of the immune system). Individuals with ageing immune systems are reported to have an inadequate response to vaccination [22-24]. Markers of immune system ageing include an inverted CD4/CD8 T-cell ratio, a decrease in the number of naive T cells (TCD4+CD45RA and TCD8+CD45), a decrease in the number of activated T cells (TCD4+CD28+ and TCD8+CD28+), senescent/memory T cells (TCD4+CD45RO and TCD8+CD45RO), and memory T cells that were neither activated nor proliferated (CD4+CD28null and TCD8+CD28null). In addition, decreased proinflammatory cytokine IFN-γ [25, 26] and increased soluble CD28 (sCD28) in the blood was also reported [27, 28].

Currently, research on the effectiveness of the Sinovac vaccine, especially in the Indonesian population, has not been widely carried out. In addition, the role of ageing of the immune system in the emergence of humoral responses after Sinovac vaccination has not been studied, but it is understandable that the ageing of immune ageing will affect immune response after vaccination make it less effective. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate the relationship between markers of immune system ageing (IFN-γ and sCD28) and the humoral immune response (neutralizing antibody) after CoronaVac (Sinovac) vaccination.

Materials and Methods

The design of this study was analytic observational, and sample was taken one time (cross sectional). Subjects were taken from medical staffs in Dr. Saiful Anwar General Hospital Malang who are willing to participate in this study.

Subjects were divided into two groups, namely the case group (elderly and patients with comorbidities) while the control group were healthy adults. All subjects already got vaccinated with CoronaVac twice and after 6-7 weeks from second dose vaccine, blood sampling is taken. The inclusion criteria for the case group were individuals aged more 60 years old or patients diagnosed with chronic diseases with pathogenesis chronic inflammation who had received the second dose of COVID-19 vaccination. We put elderly and patients with chronic inflammation in one group because both suffered from immunosenescence due to continues activation of the immune system. The inclusion criteria for the control group were healthy adults who had received the second dose of COVID-19 vaccination. Both groups are gender matched. The research subjects were taken by consecutive sampling at 6-8 weeks after the second dose of COVID-19 vaccination. The venous blood sample was collected, and serum stored at -80 °C before being examined. The anti-S-RBD antibody examination was carried out using the fluorescent immunoassay (FIA) method with FRENDTM COVID-19 SP.

The procedure is put 35 µl blood sample to cartridge then place It into FRENDTM system. Once samples react to reagents, analysis is begun and done within 3-4 minutes. Anti-S-RBD antibody is measured based on ratio of fluorescence detected by FRENDTM system. The magnitude of fluorescent ratio is proportional to the presence of anti-S-RBD antibody [29]. Soluble CD28 and IFN-γ were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit from BT Lab. ELISA plate already coated with human sCD28 or IFN-γ antibody. Substrate in the sample will bind to the antibody coated in wells, and then biotinylated antibody is added to bind substrate. Thereafter, streptavidin-HRP is added to bind biotinylated antibody. After incubation, streptavidin-HRP is washed, and then color develops in proportion to the amount of the substrate. The reaction is terminated by addition of acidic stop solution and absorbance is measured at 450 nm [30, 31].

Data analysis in this study was carried out using IBM SPSS version 24 software. The unpaired t-test or Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the levels of anti-S-RBD, sCD28, and IFN-γ antibodies between the two groups. While the correlation between anti-S-RBD antibodies with sCD28 and anti-S-RBD antibodies with IFN-γ was carried out with the Pearson or Spearman test. The data is considered statistically significant if the p-value < 0.05. The research will be carried out after obtaining an Ethics Certificate obtained from the Ethics Committee of Dr. Saiful Anwar Hospital, Malang.

Results and Discussion

Table 1 presents characteristics of the subjects in both groups. The sexes in the two groups were not significantly different but the ages in the two groups were significantly different because one of the research variables used was the age difference so that the distribution of the sample was as expected. The comorbid diseases in the cases group are hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, dyslipidaemia, obesity, asthma, cancer, and lung TB infection (Table 1).

The data normality test with Shapiro-Wilk showed that the distribution of anti-S-RBD, sCD28, and IFN-γ antibodies had an abnormal data distribution. Therefore, the different test used is Mann-Whitney test. There were no significant differences in the levels of anti-S-RBD antibodies, sCD28, and IFN-γ between the case group and the control group (Table 1 and Figure 1).

Table 1: Patient characteristics health subject and disease control

Figure 1: Boxplot of (a) IFN-γ, (b) sCD28, and (c) anti-S-RBD antibody levels between control and case group

Table 2: The correlation between anti-S-RBD antibody with sCD28 and IFN-γ

Variables

P-value

r value

Anti S-RBD antibody with sCD28

0.206

0.172

Anti S-RBD antibody with IFN-γ

0.283

0.180

Table 3: Correlation between age of the subject with sCD28, IFN-γ, and anti-S-RBD

Correlation

p value

r

Age with sCD28

0.169

-0.186

Age with IFN-γ

0.064

-0.249

Age with anti-S-RBD

0.634

-0.065

The correlation test is the Spearman correlation test because the data distribution is not normal. The correlation test was carried out between anti-S-RBD antibody levels with sCD28 and IFN-γ with the results, as presented in Table 2. Correlation between age of the subject with sCD28, IFN-γ, and anti-S-RBD is summarized at Table 3.

In this study, the levels of anti-S-RBD antibody and IFN-γ were lower in the case than control groups. However, sCD28 level is lower in case group although is not statistically significant. The level of anti-S-RBD antibody was lower in case group indicating that there was declining immune response after vaccination. This is supported by the lower level of IFN-γ in case group which reflect ageing in immune system. Some factors may influence the result of the study like the comorbid conditions in the case group varied and were likely to be under controlled conditions. Until now, the comorbid factors that play an essential role in antibody formation are unclear. The result of the study is in line with some studies that conclude elderly people tend to have lower antibody levels after vaccination than adult [32-34]. Meanwhile, various factors can affect the body's immune response to vaccines, such as microbiota conditions, lifestyle (smoking, sleep, exercise, and alcohol consumption), and birth weight or other maternal factors that were not evaluated in our study [35]. The IFN-γ examination in our study was intended to indicate ageing in the immune response that might affect the response after the second dose of Sinovac was given. There was a higher level of IFN-γ in the control group than in the case, but the difference was not significant. This result is in line with previous findings that a decrease in IFN-γ is found in elderly people [36-38], also IFN-γ is one of the immune risk profiles which indicates an immunosenescence [22]. The research on IFN-γ levels with chronic diseases such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia has also not found an increase in IFN-γ levels in comorbid conditions compared to healthy controls. Niu et al. (2013) found lower IFN-γ levels in the hypertension group than in the control group [39]. Research by Nosratabadi et al. (2009) found an increase in IFN-γ in patients with diabetes mellitus with nephropathy. It is unknown whether there is a difference of IFN-γ levels between healthy individuals with diabetes mellitus without nephropathy [40].

Based on our study, the sCD28 levels were lower in the case group than the control group but not significantly different. Decreased expression of CD28 is one of the markers of the ageing process of the immune system. Various studies have shown that in the elderly and autoimmune diseases, there is an ageing condition of the immune system (a decrease in CD28 expression). An increase in the population of CD28null T lymphocytes in the aging process of the immune system, especially in CD8+ T cells (CD8+CD28 null T cells) [41]. Research by Youn et al. (2013) found a decrease in CD28 in hypertension [42], but research on sCD28 levels in hypertension has never been done. Research by Li et al. (2021) found an increase in sCD28 levels in patients with diabetic nephropathy compared to diabetes mellitus alone. There is not known comparison of sCD28 levels in diabetes mellitus compared to healthy controls [43]. The elevated levels of sCD28 in chronic disease are found mainly in autoimmune or chronic infectious diseases [44-47] but not in metabolic diseases. According to the study by Feehan et al. (2021), the research found a decrease in CD28 count cells with age but did not examine soluble CD28 levels [48]. The correlation between anti-S-RBD antibodies with sCD28 and IFN-γ showed no correlation. This is probably due to the many confounding factors that were not such as psychological stress, microbiota, sleep quality, sedentary lifestyle, as well as smoking and alcohol drinking habit [35]. In addition, various factors that may influence the immune response to vaccines were not evaluated in this study. Some studies on IFN-γ and sCD28 have mainly been carried out in chronic autoimmune diseases or chronic infectious diseases and not in chronic metabolic diseases as in the sample used in this study. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct further research on the differences in levels of anti-S-RBD antibodies, IFN-γ, and sCD28 in healthy populations compared to the patients with uncontrolled comorbid conditions. Anti-S-RBD antibody levels and IFN-γ levels in elderly individuals or chronic metabolic diseases were lower than healthy adults showed that in elderly and or adult with comorbid there is ageing of immune system process that responsible for declining of the immune response after vaccination. However, sCD28 levels were lower in elderly individuals or chronic metabolic disease than healthy adults but not significantly different. Furthermore, this study has some limitations that may impact the result. This study lacks information about confounding factors that may impact immune-senescence, for example, gut dysbiosis, smoking habits, alcohol consumption, physical activity, etc. Likewise, this study only examines subjects once, thus the decreased of the antibody are unknown between two groups. We suggest that a cohort study needed to assess more accurate about the immunosenescence effect on immune responses after vaccination.

Conclusion

Anti S-RBD antibodies after COVID-19 vaccination is lower in elderly and adult with comorbid. IFN-γ is lower in case group because of the ageing of immune system. However, the sCD28 levels between two groups are not different.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Dean of Medical Faculty of Universitas Brawijaya and Director of Dr. Saiful Anwar Hospital for funding this research.

Disclosure Statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Authors' Contributions

All authors contributed to data analysis, drafting, and revising of the paper and agreed to be responsible for all the aspects of this work.

ORCID

Hani Susianti

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4019-9109

Elvira Sari Dewi

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1922-2693

Mufidah Afiyanti

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5324-3215

Carla Pramudita Susanto

https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3922-1582

Sherly Ramawati

https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3197-1859

Andrea Aprilia

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9732-9878

Kusworini Handono

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2123-9200

 

HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE

Kusworini Handono*, Hani Susianti, Elvira Sari Dewi, Mufidah Afiyanti, Carla Pramudita Susanto, Sherly Ramawati, Andrea Aprilia, Effect of Immune Cell Ageing on Humoral Immunity Responses Post-COVID-19 Vaccination. J. Med. Chem. Sci., 2024, 7(2) 392-401.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26655/JMCHEMSCI.2024.2.11

URL: https://www.jmchemsci.com/article_183318.html

[1]. Gülsen A., Yigitbas B.A., Uslu B., Drömann D., Kilinc O., The effect of smoking on COVID-19 symptom severity: systematic review and meta-analysis, Pulmonary medicine, 2020, 2020 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[2]. Allen J.C., Toapanta F.R., Chen W., Tennant S.M., Understanding immunosenescence and its impact on vaccination of older adults, Vaccine, 2020, 38:8264 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[3]. Jeyanathan M., Afkhami S., Smaill F., Miller M.S., Lichty B.D., Xing Z., Immunological considerations for COVID-19 vaccine strategies, Nature Reviews Immunology, 2020, 20:615 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[4]. Pereira B., Xu X.N., Akbar A.N., Targeting inflammation and immunosenescence to improve vaccine responses in the elderly, Frontiers in immunology, 2020, 11:583019 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[5]. Surendra H., Elyazar I.R., Djaafara B.A., Ekawati L.L., Saraswati K., Adrian V., Oktavia D., Salama N., Lina R.N., Andrianto A., Clinical characteristics and mortality associated with COVID-19 in Jakarta, Indonesia: A hospital-based retrospective cohort study, The Lancet Regional Health–Western Pacific, 2021, 9 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[6]. Ophinni Y., Hasibuan A.S., Widhani A., Maria S., Koesnoe S., Yunihastuti E., Karjadi T.H., Rengganis I., Djauzi S., COVID-19 vaccines: Current status and implication for use in Indonesia, Acta Medica Indonesiana, 2020, 52:388 [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[7]. Zhang Y., Zeng G., Pan H., Li C., Hu Y., Chu K., Han W., Chen Z., Tang R., Yin W., Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in healthy adults aged 18–59 years: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 clinical trial, The Lancet infectious diseases, 2021, 21:181 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[8]. Alturki S.O., Alturki S.O., Connors J., Cusimano G., Kutzler M.A., Izmirly A.M., Haddad E.K., The 2020 pandemic: current SARS-CoV-2 vaccine development, Frontiers in immunology, 2020, 11:1880 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[9]. Shah V.K., Firmal P., Alam A., Ganguly D., Chattopadhyay S., Overview of immune response during SARS-CoV-2 infection: lessons from the past, Frontiers in immunology, 2020, 11:1949 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[10]. Moss P., The T cell immune response against SARS-CoV-2, Nature immunology, 2022, 23:186 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[11]. Jain S., Batra H., Yadav P., Chand S., COVID-19 vaccines currently under preclinical and clinical studies, and associated antiviral immune response, Vaccines, 2020, 8:649 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[12]. Shirbhate E., Pandey J., Patel V.K., Kamal M., Jawaid T., Gorain B., Kesharwani P., Rajak H., Understanding the role of ACE-2 receptor in pathogenesis of COVID-19 disease: a potential approach for therapeutic intervention, Pharmacological Reports, 2021, 1 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[13]. Nugraha J., Permatasari C.A., Fitriah M., Tambunan B.A., Fuadi M.R.u., Kinetics of anti-SARS-CoV-2 responses post complete vaccination with coronavac: A prospective study in 50 health workers, Journal of Public Health Research, 2022, 11:22799036221104173 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[14]. Muñoz-Carrillo J.L., Castro-García F.P., Chávez-Rubalcaba F., Chávez-Rubalcaba, I., Martínez-Rodríguez J.L., Hernández-Ruiz M.E., Immune system disorders: hypersensitivity and autoimmunity, Immunoregulatory Aspects of Immunotherapy. London: InTechOpen, 2018, 1 [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[15]. Aboudounya M.M., Heads R.J., COVID-19 and toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4): SARS-CoV-2 may bind and activate TLR4 to increase ACE2 expression, facilitating entry and causing hyperinflammation, Mediators of inflammation, 2021, 2021:1 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[16]. Singh R.P., Javaid M., Haleem A., Vaishya R., Bahl S., Significance of Health Information Technology (HIT) in context to COVID-19 pandemic: Potential roles and challenges, Journal of Industrial Integration and Management, 2020, 5:427 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[17]. Kleanthous H., Silverman J.M., Makar K.W., Yoon I.K., Jackson N., Vaughn D.W., Scientific rationale for developing potent RBD-based vaccines targeting COVID-19, npj Vaccines, 2021, 6:128 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[18]. Zhao H., Wang T.C., Li X.F., Zhang N.N., Li L., Zhou C., Deng Y.Q., Cao T.S., Yang G., Li R.T., Long-term stability and protection efficacy of the RBD-targeting COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in nonhuman primates, Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy, 2021, 6:438 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[19]. Batra M., Tian R., Zhang C., Clarence E., Sacher C.S., Miranda J.N., De La Fuente J.R.O., Mathew M., Green D., Patel S., Role of IgG against N-protein of SARS-CoV2 in COVID19 clinical outcomes, Scientific Reports, 2021, 11:3455 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[20]. Du L., Yang Y., Zhang X., Neutralizing antibodies for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19, Cellular & molecular immunology, 2021, 18:2293 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[21]. Morales-Núñez J.J., Muñoz-Valle J.F., Torres-Hernández P.C., Hernández-Bello J., Overview of neutralizing antibodies and their potential in COVID-19, Vaccines, 2021, 9:1376 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[22]. Pera A., Campos C., López N., Hassouneh F., Alonso C., Tarazona R., Solana R., Immunosenescence: implications for response to infection and vaccination in older people, Maturitas, 2015, 82:50 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[23]. Crooke S.N., Ovsyannikova I.G., Poland G.A., Kennedy R.B., Immunosenescence and human vaccine immune responses, Immunity & ageing, 2019, 16:1 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[24]. Le Lee J., Linterman M.A., Mechanisms underpinning poor antibody responses to vaccines in ageing, Immunology letters, 2022, 241:1 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[25]. Noh G., Ifn-Gamma as a major antiviral therapeutic for viral epidemics, including severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2): a clinically forgotten but potential antiviral cytokine and non-virus-specific antiviral as a new antiviral strategy, Journal of Clinical Review & Case Reports, 2020, 5 [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[26]. Feng E., Balint E., Poznanski S.M., Ashkar A.A., Loeb M., Aging and interferons: impacts on inflammation and viral disease outcomes, Cells, 2021, 10:708 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[27]. Pietrobon A.J., Teixeira F.M.E., Sato M.N., I mmunosenescence and inflammaging: risk factors of severe COVID-19 in older people, Frontiers in immunology, 2020, 11:579220 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[28]. Handono K., Pratama M.Z., Susianti H., Wahono C.S., Firdaningrum N.E., Famuji S.R.R., Sumarta N.H., Fachry A.W.R., Poetri L.N., Kalim H., The Role of Soluble Costimulatory Molecules as the Biomarkers for Aging Predictors, Jurnal Kedokteran Brawijaya, 2023 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[29]. NanoEntek. FREND COVID-19 SP: NanoEntek, Inc; 2021
[30]. Lab B. Human Interferon Gamma, IFN-G ELISA Kit [Publisher]
 [31]. Lab B. Human T-cell-specific Surface Glycoprotein Cd28, CD28 ELISA Kit [Publisher]
[32]. Ranzani O.T., Hitchings M., Dorion M., D’Agostini T.L., de Paula R.C., de Paula O.F.P., de Moura Villela E.F., Torres M.S.S., de Oliveira S.B., Schulz W., Effectiveness of the CoronaVac vaccine in the elderly population during a P. 1 variant-associated epidemic of COVID-19 in Brazil: A test-negative case-control study, medrxiv, 2021, 2021.05. 19.21257472 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[33]. Seyahi E., Bakhdiyarli G., Oztas M., Kuskucu M.A., Tok Y., Sut N., Ozcifci G., Ozcaglayan A., Balkan I.I., Saltoglu N., Antibody response to inactivated COVID-19 vaccine (CoronaVac) in immune-mediated diseases: a controlled study among hospital workers and elderly, Rheumatology international, 2021, 41:1429 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[34]. Medeiros G.X., Sasahara G.L., Magawa J.Y., Nunes J.P.S., Bruno F.R., Kuramoto A.C., Almeida R.R., Ferreira M.A., Scagion G.P., Candido É.D., Reduced T cell and antibody responses to inactivated coronavirus vaccine among individuals above 55 years old, Frontiers in immunology, 2022, 13:812126 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[35]. Zimmermann P., Curtis N., Factors that influence the immune response to vaccination, Clinical microbiology reviews, 2019, 32:10.1128/cmr. 00084 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[36]. Ouyang Q., Cicek G., Westendorp R., Cools H., van der Klis R.J., Remarque E., Reduced IFN-γ production in elderly people following in vitro stimulation with influenza vaccine and endotoxin, Mechanisms of ageing and development, 2001, 121:131 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[37]. El Yousfi M., Mercier S., Breuillé D., Denis P., Papet I., Mirand P.P.,Obled C., The inflammatory response to vaccination is altered in the elderly, Mechanisms of ageing and development, 2005, 126:874 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[38]. Bang Y.J., Hong S.H., Park H.J., Kwak H.W., Lee Y.S., Kim J.Y., Park H.J., Bae S.H., Kim H.J., Kim Y.H., Effective inactivated influenza vaccine for the elderly using a single-stranded RNA-based adjuvant, Scientific Reports, 2021, 11:11981 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[39]. Niu Z., Zhou J., Ji W., Li H., Bai D., Yang H., The association of psychological stress related cytokines (TNF Alpha, IFN-Gamma) with essential hypertension in Ningxia Hui autonomous region, Open Journal of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, 2013, 2013 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[40]. Nosratabadi R., Arababadi M.K., Hassanshahi G., Yaghini N., Pooladvand V., Shamsizadeh A., Zarandi E., Hakimi H., Evaluation of IFN-gamma serum level in nephropatic type 2 diabetic patients, Pakistan journal of biological sciences: PJBS, 2009, 12:746 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[41]. Bischof J., Gärtner F., Zeiser K., Kunz R., Schreiner C., Hoffer E., Burster T., Knippschild U., Zimecki M., Immune cells and immunosenescence, Folia biologica, 2019, 65:53 [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[42]. Youn J.C., Yu H.T., Lim B.J., Koh M.J., Lee J., Chang D.Y., Choi Y.S., Lee S.H., Kang S.M., Jang Y., Immunosenescent CD8+ T cells and CXC chemokine receptor type 3 chemokines are increased in human hypertension, Hypertension, 2013, 62:126 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[43]. Li N.L., Coates P.T., Rovin B.H., COVID-19 vaccination followed by activation of glomerular diseases: does association equal causation?, Kidney International, 2021, 100:959 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[44]. Sun Z., Yi L., Tao H., Huang J., Jin Z., Xiao Y., Feng C., Sun J., Clinical immunology Enhancement of soluble CD28 levels in the serum of Graves’ disease, Central European Journal of Immunology, 2014, 39:216 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[45]. Cao J., Zhang L., Huang S., Chen P., Zou L., Chen H., Xiang Y., Lai X., Ren G., Aberrant production of soluble co-stimulatory molecules CTLA-4 and CD28 in patients with chronic hepatitis B, Microbial pathogenesis, 2011, 51:262 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[46]. Hamzaoui K., Hamzaoui A., Bouajina L., Houman H., Circulating soluble CD28 in patients with Behçet's disease: relationship to clinical manifestations, Clinical and experimental rheumatology, 2005, 23:S [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[47]. García‐Chagollán M., Ledezma‐Lozano I.Y., Hernández‐Bello J., Sánchez‐Hernández P.E., Gutiérrez‐Ureña S.R., Muñoz‐Valle J.F., Expression patterns of CD28 and CTLA‐4 in early, chronic, and untreated rheumatoid arthritis, Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis, 2020, 34:e23188 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[48]. Feehan J., Tripodi N., Apostolopoulos V., The twilight of the immune system: The impact of immunosenescence in aging, Maturitas, 2021, 147:7 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]