Document Type : Original Article (Special Issue)

Author

Department of Biology, College of Education for Girls, University of Mosul, Iraq

Abstract

Campylobacter(C)spp. are curved, Gram-negative. They are common prevalent causes of zoonotic disease. C.jejuni and C.coli are responsible of about 90% of Campylobacteriosis, associated with diarrheal symptoms. The collected samples included stool of children suffering from diarrhea (80,100%). The classical diagnostic methods like direct examination using gram stain or indirect examination via cultivation and purification with special medium assisted us to select 20 isolates (C1-C20, 25%), while biochemical reaction reduced the suspected samples to 9 isolates (C1, C2, C6, C7, C11, C13, C14 and C20). Antibiotic susceptibility test was carried out to show the bacterial susceptibility to the utilized antibacterial, revealing different percent as resist (tetracycline; 4samples, 45% C1, C2, C6 and C13) and sensitive 6(C6, C7, C13, C14, C17 and C20). Molecular screening was more sensitive by detecting some genetic elements responsible for drug resistance like tetO gene(3saples,559bp.tetracycline)and apha-3gene(2 samples,600bp.aminoglycosides),and virB-11(2 samples,708)as virulence factor gene. Finally, the sequence of tetO (3samples) was confirmed by diagnosing Campylobacter spp. as C.jejuni.

Graphical Abstract

Identification of Genetic Markers of Drug Resistance and Virulence Factor Gene in Campylobacter Jejuni Isolated From Children in North Iraq

Keywords

Main Subjects

Introduction

Campylobacter are small, spirally curved, Gram-negative. They are common prevalent causes of food-related infections over all the world. Their ability to multiply in a microaerophilic atmosphere (7-10%CO2), with a temperature range of 30-42◦C, distinguishes them from other foodborne pathogens [1].

There are currently 32 species and 13 subspecies belonging to this genus; among these taxa, the enteric pathogens C. jejuni and C. coli account for about 90% of Campylobacteriosis [2,3]. Most clinical cases of Campylobacteriosis are associated with gastroenteritis, which include acute watery or bloody diarrhea, abdominal pain, vomiting, fever and dehydration, in addition to other complications, such as urinary tract infections, septicemia, arthritis, Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS), irritable bowel and Miller Fisher syndrome, MFS [4,5,6,7].

Generally, multidrug resistance and ability to produce some virulence factors have been reported as an essential virulence determinants [8-10]. Aminoglycosides and tetracycline are antibacterial agents, commonly used against Campylobacter spp., which in turn, revealed variant resistance level against them [11]. Tetracyclines are used in treatment of both of animal and human infections, as a broad spectrum low economic therapy, making it a common prophylactic source incorporated with animal feeds at subtherapeutic doses to act as a growth promoter, which in turn leads to development of bacterial drug resistance [12,13]. Campylobacter tetracycline resistance is mostly conferred by a ribosomal protection protein (RPP). Campylobacter tetO is a gene responsible for tetracycline resistance, being capable of displacing tetracycline from its primary binding site on the 30Sribosomal subunit [14,15]. They can be located both on chromosome and plasmid [16]. RPPs are widely disseminated among bacterial genera and it has been reported that tetO gene was confirmed in eleven bacterial genera. Some were Gram negative and other Gram positive [33]; tetO acquisition among several members of bacterial isolates indicates that genetic elements like plasmids, transposons, or recombinant process events contribute to distribution and conserve it [17]. Aminoglycosides with broad antimicrobial spectrum inhibit protein synthesis via16SrRNA binding of ribosomal small subunit [18]. Campylobacter spp. resists aminoglycosides by inhibiting antimicrobial binding affinity for target sites due to enzymatic modification, like acetylation, phosphorylation or amino group adenylation [19,20]. Several virulence factor genes were identified in Campylobacter subspecies, including those encoding proteins involved in bacterial invasion. Genetic analysis revealed that Campylobacter have pathogenicity islands (PIs) harbors genes encoding bacterial type IV secretion system, T4SS, virB-virD4 genes. In vitro studies demonstrated that the T4SS contributes to invasiveness of Campylobacter virulence factor [21].

This project focused on isolation and purification of Campylobacter spp., investigation of its resistance to some antibacterial and their responsible genetic determinants. In addition, we investigated virulence factor gene responsible for invasion of several species belonged to genus Campylobacter.

Materials and methods

Samples collection

Campylobacter isolates of this study came from kids’ faeces samples (80), suffering from diarrhea in Medya Diagnostic center in Irbil /Iraq during May-October 2018.

Isolation and phenotypic identification

Purification and identification of Campylobacter spp. were carried out according to ISO10272-1:2006 protocol. All samples were cultivated onto modified Charcoal Cefoperazone Deoxycholate agar, mCCDA (Oxoid, UK) under micro-aerophilic condition with 5-10%CO2 at 41 °C for 48-72 h to isolate bacterial strains in single pure form. Suspected colonies were cultivated onto Columbia Blood agar (Oxoid, UK), under the same incubation conditions. The classical macroscopic and microscopic investigation were conducted as prediagnosis. Biochemical reactions (Urease, Indolacetatehydrolysis, H2S production and Hippurate hydrolysis) were considered as a second diagnostic step to confirm Campylobacter spp. [1,22,23].

Antibiotic susceptibility profile

This test was conducted to distinguish antibiotic susceptibility of suspected campylobacter isolates (9) to some antibiotics utilized as therapeutic options for Campylobacter recovered from diarrheal case. Utilizing Mueller-Hinton agar, the disk diffusion method was done for ampicillin (10 μg), erythromycin (15 μg), tetra-cycline (30 μg), co-trimoxzole (25 μg), cephalothin (30 μg), gentamycin (10 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg) and oxacillin, 1 μg (Oxoid, UK). The interpretations were reported according to guidelines from Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [24].

Molecular screening profile

Genomic DNA (gDNA) extraction

DNA was extracted using Wizard genomic DNA (g DNA) Purification kit (Promega, USA), according to manufacturer’s instructions. DNA integrity was evaluated via OWL electrophoresis system (Thermo, USA) using 5 µl of gDNA on 1% agarose gel concentration (Promega, USA). DNA concentration was estimated by Quantus Fluorometer (Promega, USA), which was standardized to 10ng/µl. and preserved at-20 until use [25].

Genetic determinants and amplification and sequencing screening

PCRs premix was 12.5 µl (Promega, USA); additional components were 1 µl (10 µM) of each of forward and reverse primer sets (Promega, USA) and 2 µl of gDNA (10 ng/µl). The final volume was completed by 25µl. with nuclease free water (8.5 µl). The primer sets used in this research are listed in Table 1. Reaction steps were denaturation at 94 °C for 4 min, and 35cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 sec. Primers anneal temperatures involved 50, 52 and 55 °C for 30 sec. to hybridize tetO, virB11, and aphA-3, respectively [26,27], extension at 72 ◦C for 30sec and final extension at 72 °C for 5mins. PCR products of tetO gene were purified using PCR Purification Kit (Promega, USA). Then, it was sequenced and analyzed for forward by macrogen (S. Korea) using genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems 3500, USA). The sequence was aligned (MegaX software) and assembled on the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) and the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST).

Table 1: Sequences of primer sets used in this study

Gene

Sequence (5’- 3’)

Amplicon size

reference

TetO

F

GGCGTTTTGTTTATGTGCG

559 bp.

[35]

R

ATGGACAACCCGACAGAAGC

VirB11

F

GAACAGGAAGTGG AAAAACTAGC

708 bp.

[35]

R

TTCCGCATTGGGCTATATG

aphA-3

F

GGGACCACCTATGATGTGGAACG

600 bp.

[36]

R

CAGGCTTGATCCCCAGTAAGTC

 

 

Results and Discussion

Microscopic, macroscopically and biochemical tests of Campaylobacter spp.

Twenty samples were suspected as C. jejuni, using routine staining depending gram staining method, under oil immersion as comain shape. On the other hand, biochemical reaction was conducted to confirm the diagnosis of C. jejuni. Nine selected isolates showed positive results for hyppurate hydrolysis and indole acetate hydrolysis. In addition, they revealed a negative result for urease, oxidase and H2S production, as detailed in Tables 2 and 3.

 

Table 2: Gram stain and two biochemical reactions for Campylobacter prediagnosis

                   Isolate

Test

C1

C2

C3

C4

C5

C6

C7

C8

C9

C10

C11

C12

C13

C14

C15

C16

C17

C18

C19

C20

Gram stain

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

Hyppurate hydrolysis

+

+

_

_

_

+

+

_

_

_

+

_

+

+

_

_

+

_

_

+

Indole acetate hydrolysis

+

+

_

_

_

+

+

_

_

_

+

_

+

+

_

_

+

_

_

+

(C)Compaylobacter spp.,(+) positive result,(-) negative result

Our results were agreed with those documented by [28] who detected C.jujeni utilizing traditional diagnostic methods. Another study was carried out to isolate and detect C.jujenifrom food source contaminated with it [29], depending on biochemical reaction for determining this pathogen

Table 3: Microscopic and biochemical diagnosis of C. jejuni

Test

Suspected samples

Positive result

Negative result

Microscopic examination

80

20(C1-C20)

60

Biochemical tests

20

9(C1,C2,C6,C7,C11,C13,C14 and C20)

11

 

Antibacterial susceptibility surveillance

Nine samples were diagnosed as C.jujeni, revealing  variant levels between resistance and sensitivity to several utilized antibacterial agents, but C1,C2 and C6 resisted most antibiotics. In contrast, C7 and C20 were susceptible to more than two antibiotics. More details are presented in Table (4) below.

 

Table 4: Antibacterial susceptibility test for C.jujeni. isolated trains

Antibacterial

Sensitive isolates

(%)

Resistance isolates

(%)

Moderate

(%)

Tetracycline

4(C7,C11,C17 and C20)

44%

4( C1,C2,C6 and C13)

45%*

1(C14)

11%

Ampicillin

0

0

9(C1-C20)

100%

0

0

Gentamycin

6(C6,C7,C13,C14,C17and C20)

67%

1(C1)

11%*

2(C2 and C11)

11%

Oxacillin

3(C6,C7 and C20)

33%

4(C1,C2,C14 and C17)

45%*

2(C11 and C13)

22%

Co-trimoxazole

2(C11 and C20)

22%

5(C1,C2,C6,C13 and C17)

56%

2(C7 and C14)

22%

Erythromycin

0

0

9(C1-C20)

100%

0

0

Cephalothin

2(C11 and C20)

22%

6(C1,C2,C13,C14 and C17)

67%

2(C6 and C7)

22%

Cefotaxime

4(C6,C13,C17 and C20)

44%

3(C1,C7 and C14)

33%

2(C2 and C11)

22%

Denotes approximately

Many studies have been carried out to check C.jejuni reaction towards most common antibacterial agents, like Issa.’s (2018) inquiry, reporting that this gram negative bacterium revealed high resistance percent to tetracycline (70.3%) and low percent of resistance to gentamicin (4.2%), the results of which are in agreement with those of the present study, while a study              detected high percent of resistance to gentamicin (100%), and tetracycline (100%) [30], being dissimilar to our screening in this research article. Over all, resistance level was increased by C.jejuni to some antibacterial in the last decade. Due to use of many common antibacterial as a prophylactic option with animals feeding, acquired mutation have an important role in amino acids substitution, while the genetic elements transferring have a critical effect on acquisition of new mutations, which in turn lead to emerge multi-drug resistance bacteria [31,32].

Molecular screening profile 

Molecular assay assist in detection and classification of C.jejuni. In this field, the genetic determinants are responsible for antibacterial resistance, like tetO (559bp), apha-3(708bp). In addition, virB11(600bp) as a virulence factor gene was demonstrated via electrophoresis. Figure 1 represents the gel pages with amplicons belonging to previous genes.

Figure 1: Genetic determinants `s amplification products. At right TetO(559bp.), lines 1-3(C1, C2 and C13) are positive result, in the middlea phA-3(708bp), lines 1&2(C1and C13) are positive results, and at left virB11 (600bp.) lines 1& 2 (C1andC2) are positive results

The present outcomes for amplification of tetO (559bp.), aphA-3(708bp) and virB11 (600bp.) are in line with those detailed by [26] and [27], respectively, for detection of previous genes.

  The phenotypic investigation revealed that four isolates (45%) resisted tetracycline, while molecular screening showed that three isolates (33%) represented a positive result for presence of tetO gene. TetO had a critical role in tetracycline resistance, via displacing tetracycline from its primary binding site on the small ribosomal subunit [33]. Additionally, in many tetracycline resistance cases there are other genes like tetw or tet (O,32, O) that may be play the same role in the incidence of tetracycline resistance phenomenon [34]. At the same time, two isolates (50%) were positive for the presence of aphA-3 (708bp), as aminoglycoside resistance gene (Gentamicin) whereas one isolate resisted gentamicin phenotypically. These outcomes mean that molecular survey was more sensitive for detection of the genetic determinants of antibiotic resistance, as shown in Table (4). On the other hand, two isolates (C1&C2) were positive for presence of virB11gene (bp.), that were responsible for invasion of protein.

Table 4: Phenotypic and genotypic comparison of tetracycline and   aminoglycosides resistance

Total

PCR

Tests

Negative

Positive

%

No.

%

No.

9(100%)

11

1

33.3

3

+ve

Antibacterial susceptibility assay

(Tetracycline)

4

21

56

5

0

0

-ve

5

9(100%)

0

0

22

2

+ve

Antibacterial susceptibility assay

(Gentamicin)

1

89

8

0

0

-ve

8

 

Sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree of CampylobactertetO gene are presented. The sequences of the three tetO gene amplicons was depended on investigating the relationship among C.jejuni isolated strains (C1,C2andC13) in this research. Sequences outcomes revealed high similarity among previous isolates, as that appeared in the dendogram.

Figure 2: Phylogenetic tree show, high similarity between C-1,C2 andC-13, on the basis of the sequences alignment

 

The sequence of tetO gene was aligned using BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool). The identification percents (100%) for all sequences (C1, C1 andC13) revealed that three bacterial isolates belong to C.jujeni , as those documented in Figures 3, 4 and 5.

Figure 3: Alignment of C1-tetO sequence with known sequence in NCBI (Accession no.: CP044169.1)

Figure 4: Alignment of C2-tetO sequence with known sequence in NCBI (Accession no.: CP044175.1)

Figure 5: Alignment of C3-tetO sequence with known sequence in NCBI (Accession no.: CP044169.1)

 

Conclusion

According to the present results, we concluded that C.jujeni is an important pathogen, due to having a genetic elements like plasmid and transposon and integron. In addition to many specific sequences known as PAIs, it assists transport by livestock animals and food born, and also resists many antibiotics due to acquiring resistance genes via conjugation or transformation or by genetic manipulation; this may reduce the therapeutic options in this field, while the presence of virulence factors genes assists this bacterium to invade and colonize many organs outside the intestinal gut. The molecular screening showed high sensitivity and specificity for detection of the genetic determinants in this research in comparison to phenotypic diagnosis, whereas the sequences alignment is still as a gold standard tool to confirm the primary diagnosis foe C.jujeni.

Acknowledgment

I would like to thanks to the department of biology, Collage of Education for Girls, University of Mosul for laboratory facilities.

 

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

 

Authors' contributions

All authors contributed to data analysis, drafting, and revising of the paper and agreed to be responsible for all the aspects of this work.

 

Conflict of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest in this study.

 

 

HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE

Baydaa Ghanim Mohammed. Identification of Genetic Markers of Drug Resistance and Virulence Factor Gene in Campylobacter Jejuni Isolated From Children in North Iraq. J. Med. Chem. Sci., 2022, 5(7) 1191-1199

https://doi.org/10.26655/JMCHEMSCI.2022.7.7

URL: http://www.jmchemsci.com/article_153449.html

[1]. Borkakoty B., Jakharia A., Sarmah M.D., Hazarika R., Baruah P.J., Bora C.J., Temsu T., Gohain M., Devi U., Biswas D., Prevalence of campylobacter enteritis in children under 5 years hospitalised for diarrhoea in two cities of Northeast India, Indian journal of medical microbiology, 2020, 38:32 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[2]. Gilbreath J.J., Cody W.L., Merrell D.S., Hendrixson D.R., Change is good: variations in common biological mechanisms in the epsilonproteobacterial genera Campylobacter and Helicobacter, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 2011, 75:84 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[3]. Kaakoush N.O., Castaño-Rodríguez N., Mitchell H.M., Man S.M., Global Epidemiology of Campylobacter Infection, Clinical microbiology reviews, 2015, 28:687 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[4]. Heikema A.P., Islam Z., Horst-Kreft D., Huizinga R., Jacobs B.C., Wagenaar J.A., Poly F., Guerry P., van Belkum A., Parker C.T., Endtz H.P., Campylobacter jejuni capsular genotypes are related to Guillain-Barré syndrome, Clinical Microbiology and Infectious, 2015, 21:852.e1 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[5]. Nyati K.K., Nyati R., Role of Campylobacter jejuni infection in the pathogenesis of Guillain-Barré syndrome: an update, BioMed research international, 2013, 2013:852195 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[6]. Karikari A.B., Obiri-Danso K., Frimpong E.H., Antibiotic resistance in Campylobacter isolated from patients with gastroenteritis in a teaching hospital in Ghana, Open Journal of Medical Microbiology, 2017, 7:1 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[7]. Facciolà A., Riso R., Avventuroso E., Visalli G., Delia S.A., Laganà P. Campylobacter:from microbiology to prevention. Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene, 2017, 58:E79 [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[8]. Costa D., Iraola G., Pathogenomics of Emerging Campylobacter Species, Clinical microbiology reviews, 2019, 32:e00072 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[9]. Korolik V., The role of chemotaxis during Campylobacter jejuni colonisation and pathogenesis, Current opinion in Microbiology, 2019, 47:32 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[10]. Singh A., Mallick A.I., Role of putative virulence traits of Campylobacter jejuni in regulating differential host immune responses, Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea), 2019, 57:298 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[11]. Granados-Chinchilla F., Rodríguez C., Tetracyclines in Food and Feedingstuffs: From Regulation to Analytical Methods, Bacterial Resistance, and Environmental and Health Implications, Journal of analytical methods in chemistry, 2017, 2017:1315497 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[12]. Nguyen F., Starosta A.L., Arenz S., Sohmen D., Dönhöfer A., Wilson D.N., Tetracycline antibiotics and resistance mechanisms, Biological chemistry, 2014, 395:559 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[13]. Warburton P.J., Amodeo N., Roberts A.P., Mosaic tetracycline resistance genes encoding ribosomal protection proteins, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2016, 71:3333 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[14]. Marotta F., Garofolo G., di Marcantonio L., Di Serafino G., Neri D., Romantini R., Sacchini L., Alessiani A., Di Donato G., Nuvoloni R., Janowicz A., Di Giannatale E., Antimicrobial resistance genotypes and phenotypes of Campylobacter jejuni isolated in Italy from humans, birds from wild and urban habitats, and poultry, PloS one, 2019, 14:e0223804 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[15]. Li W., Atkinson G.C., Thakor N.S., Allas U., Lu C.C., Chan K.Y., Tenson T., Schulten K., Wilson K.S., Hauryliuk V., Frank J., Mechanism of tetracycline resistance by ribosomal protection protein Tet(O), Nature communications, 2013, 4:1477 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[16]. Di Giannatale E., Di Serafino G., Zilli K., Alessiani A., Sacchini L., Garofolo G., Aprea G., Marotta F., Characterization of antimicrobial resistance patterns and detection of virulence genes in Campylobacter isolates in Italy, Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2014, 14:3308 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[17]. Tang Y., Fang L., Xu C., Zhang Q., Antibiotic resistance trends and mechanisms in the foodborne pathogen, Campylobacter, Animal health research reviews, 2017, 18:87 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[18]. Yao H., Liu D., Wang Y., Zhang Q., Shen Z., High Prevalence and Predominance of the aph(2″)-If Gene Conferring Aminoglycoside Resistance in Campylobacter, Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2017, 61:e00112 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[19]. Wang Y., Zhang M., Deng F., Shen Z., Wu C., Zhang J., Zhang Q., Shen J., Emergence of multidrug-resistant Campylobacter species isolates with a horizontally acquired rRNA methylase, Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2014, 58:5405 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[20]. Zhang X., Zhou Q., Tang M., Pu J., Zhang J., Lu J., Zhang Y., Gao Y., Aminoglycoside Resistance and Possible Mechanisms in Campylobacter Spp. Isolated From Chicken and Swine in Jiangsu, China, Frontiers in microbiology, 2021, 12:716185 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[21]. Kreling V., Falcone F.H., Kehrenberg C., Hensel A., Campylobacter sp.: Pathogenicity factors and prevention methods-new molecular targets for innovative antivirulence drugs?, Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2020, 104:10409 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[22]. Nachamkin I., Nguyen P., Isolation of Campylobacter Species from Stool Samples by Use of a Filtration Method: Assessment from a United States-Based Population, Journal of clinical microbiology, 2017, 55:2204 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[23]. Zeinhom M., Abdel-Latef G.K., Corke H., Prevalence, Characterization, and Control of Campylobacter jejuni Isolated from Raw Milk, Cheese, and Human Stool Samples in Beni-Suef Governorate, Egypt, Foodborne pathogens and disease, 2021, 18:322 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[24]. 2021 . Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing,M100, 31st ed. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
[25]. Nakari U.M., Puhakka A., Siitonen A., Correct identification and discrimination between Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli by a standardized hippurate test and species-specific polymerase chain reaction. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 2008, 27:513 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[26]. Ghorbanalizadgan M., Bakhshi B., Kazemnejad Lili A., Najar-Peerayeh S., Nikmanesh B., A molecular survey of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli virulence and diversity. Iranian biomedical journal, 2014, 18:158 [Google Scholar]
[27]. Elmi A., Nasher F., Dorrell N., Wren B., Gundogdu O., Revisiting Campylobacter jejuni Virulence and Fitness Factors: Role in Sensing, Adapting, and Competing, Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2021, 10:607704 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[28]. Guirado P., Miró E., Iglesias-Torrens Y., Navarro F., Campoy S., Alioto T.S., Gómez-Garrido J., Madrid C., Balsalobre C., A New Variant of the aadE-sat4-aphA-3 Gene Cluster Found in a Conjugative Plasmid from a MDR Campylobacter jejuni Isolate, Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022, 11:466 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[29]. Issa G., Kahraman B.B., Adiguzel M.C., Yilmaz Eker F., Akkaya E., Bayrakal G.M., Koluman A., Kahraman T., Prevalence and Antimic- robial Resistance of Thermophilic Campylobacter Isolates from Raw Chicken Meats, Kafkas Univ. Vet. Fak. Derg., 2018, 24:701 [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[30]. Weis A.M., Storey D.B., Taff C.C., Townsend A.K., Huang B.C., Kong N.T., Clothier K.A., Spinner A., Byrne B.A., Weimer B.C., Genomic Comparison of Campylobacter spp. and Their Potential for Zoonotic Transmission between Birds, Primates, and Livestock, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2016, 82:7165 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[31]. Fabre A., Oleastro M., Nunes A., Santos A., Sifré E., Ducournau A., Bénéjat L., Buissonnière A., Floch P., Mégraud F., Dubois V., Lehours P., Whole-Genome Sequence Analysis of Multidrug-Resistant Campylobacter Isolates: a Focus on Aminoglycoside Resist-ance Determinants, Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2018, 56:e00390 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[32]. Cha W., Mosci R., Wengert S.L., Singh P., Newton D.W., Salimnia H., Lephart P., Khalife W., Mansfield L.S., Rudrik J.T., Manning S.D., Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiles of Human Campylobacter jejuni Isolates and Association with Phylogenetic Lineages, Frontiers in microbiology, 2016, 7:589 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[33]. European Food Safety Authority, & European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. The European Union summary report on antimicrobial resistance in zoonotic and indicator bacteria from humans, animals and food in 2015. EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2017, 15 [Publisher]
[34]. Cody A.J., Maiden M.C., Strachan N.J., N.D. McCarthy, A systematic review of source attribution of human campylobacteriosis using multilocus sequence typing, Eurosurveillance, 2019, 24:1800696 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[35]. Cross S.E., Bacon P.L., Morris M.L., The relational-interdependent self-construal and relationships. Journal of personality and social psychology, 2000, 78:791 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[36]. Gibreel A., Tracz D.M., Nonaka L., Ngo T.M., Connell S.R., Taylor D.E., Incidence of antibiotic resistance in Campylobacter jejuni isolated in Alberta, Canada, from 1999 to 2002, with special reference to tet (O)-mediated tetracycline resistance. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2004, 48:3442 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]