Document Type : Original Article (Special Issue)

Author

Department of Chemistry, College of Education for Women, University of Tikrit, Tikrit, Iraq

Abstract

In this study, new semicarbazide derivatives [E1-E5] were prepared by the reaction of semicarbazide with different fatty acids (olic, linolic, linolinic, recenolic and cinnamic  acid) in DMF, then this compounds will polymerization with malic anhydride in H2O2 as initiator to get [EP1-EP5] .The prepared compounds were characterized by physical properties, UV-Vis, FT-IR, 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR and TGA analysis.TLC checked the purity for these compounds.The antibacterial activity were studied against different kinds  of bacteria, namlyStophylococcuceaures,Stophylococcuce Saprophytic and Protes.

Graphical Abstract

Preparation and Characterization and Thermal Study of New Copolymers of Semicarbazide and Fatty Acids Derivatives with Malic Anhydride and Assess their Biological Activity

Keywords

Main Subjects

Introduction

Plant oils offer many advantages apart from their renewability .Their world -wide availability and relatively low prices make them industrially attractive and feasible .as daily demonstrated with industrial oleo chemistry. Furthermore diverse chemistry can be applied on them .Leading to a large variety of monomers and polymers [1]. Most importantly, the synthetic potential of nature is very high with this renewable feedstock and consequently .Only a few minor modification reactions (if any at all) have to be performed in order to obtain suitable monomers for many different applications [2]. The double bonds present in fatty acids [FA] make them ideal starting materials for such transformations .Moreover olefin metathesis can not only be used for monomer synthesis but also as polymerization technique [3]. The possibility of polymerization of FA is feasible since in their structure many double bonds are found and available .Therefore, there is favored radical polymerization reaction through the hydrogen in the allyl position, duo to the higher reactivity of this hydrogen creating a distinct monomer [4]. A large number of polymers applications results from their early properties and the way they are processed. In order to increase these applications and also to improve some properties, it is common in polymer industry to under go by synthesis modification [4]. In a recent studies fatty acids demonstrated biological activity [5-18] and some physical properties [19-28] and its polymers [29-41].

Materials and Methods

All chemicals had been used as supplied by (Alfa Assar and Aldrich).

Devices instrument

The melting points were determined by Electro thermal Melting Apparatus 9300 in open capillary tubes that were uncorrected. Thin layer chromatography (TLC) was used for monitory the reaction and check purity.The FT-IR spectra were recorded using FT-IR 8400s shimadzu spectro photometer scale (400-4000 cm-1). The UV-Vis spectra was measured in ethanol using shimadzu 800UV in rang (200-400) nm. 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR spectrum was recorded on Varianoperaing at 400 MHz instrument using DMSO-d6 and CDCl3 as a solvent.Thermal analysis Tgwas recorded on instrument SDT Q600 V20.9 Build 20 under Nitrogen.

Synthesis methods.

Synthesis of semicarbazide derivatives [E1-E5]

Semicarbazide (0.0l mol, 0.75 g) was dissolved in (50 mL) of DMF. After complete dissolving, 0.0l mol of  one of different fatty acid was add .After adding (3 drops) of diluted H2SO4 (1:1), the mixture was then refluxed for 4-5 hours and cooled to room temperature .Filtered, dried and recrystallized physical properties are given in Table 1 [42].

 

Table 1: Physical properties of prepared compounds [E1-E5]

Comp.

No.

R

Molecular formula

M.Wt. (g/mole)

Color

M.P

(°C)

Time

(h)

Yield

(%)

Rf.

EtOH

(cm)

E1

CH3(CH2)CH=CH(CH)7C=O

C19H37N3O2

340.53

White

261 dce.

4

82

3

E2

CH3(CH2)4CH=CHCH2=CH(CH2)7C=O

C19H35N3O2

338.52

White

265

4

60

2.6

E3

CH3CH2(CH=CHCH2)3CH(CH)7C=O

C19H33N3O2

332.50

Yellow

268-270

4

75

5

E4

CH3(CH2)5CH(OH)CH2CH=CH(CH2)7C=O

C19H37N3O3

356.52

White

212-214

5

23

1

E5

Ph-CH=CH-C=O

C10H11N3O2

221.23

White

160

6

50

5

 

Synthesis of polymer [EP1-EP5]

In dry polymerization bottle (0.0l mol) of semicarbzide derivatives [E1-E5] and equivalent moles of malic anhydride was dissolved in (10 mL) of DMF then (0.1 L of H2O2 was add and bottle was flushed with nitrogen and fimly stoppered.The mixture was maintained at 80 °C for 3 h. then the resulted solution was poured into 25 mL of ethanol and precipitated polymer was filtered  washed with ethanol and dried physical properties of polymer [EP1-EP5] are listed in Table 2 [43].

 

Table 2: Physical properties of prepared polymer [EP1-EP5]

Comp.

No.

R

Color

S.P.

(°C)

Yield

(%)

R.f. EtOH (cm)

Ep1

CH3(CH2)7CH=CH(CH)7C=O

Dark Brown

>300

85

1

Ep2

CH3(CH2)4CH=CHCH2ch=CH(CH2)7C=O

Dark Brown

198 dec.

75

1.5

Ep3

CH3(CH2)4CH=CHCH2CH=CH CH2CH=CH(CH2)7C=O

Dark Brown

142 dec.

70

1.6

Ep4

CH3(CH2)5CH(OH)CH2CH=CH(CH2)7C=O

Brown

130-137

85

1.2

Ep5

Ph-CH=CH-C=O

Yellow

194 dec.

80

1.8

 

Scheme 1: Synthesis of polymer [EP1-EP5]

Results and Discussion

Characterization of seiecarbazide derivatives [E1-E5]

The semicarbazide derivatives [E1-E5] were prepared by the reaction semicarbazide with (1mol) of fatty acids (olic, lenolic, lenolinic, recenolic and cinnamic acid) in DMF.

 The UV spectra gave absorption band at different wave lengthe for the resulted semicarbazide derivatives (in %99 EtOH) due to π π* and n π* transition and all these transition are listed in Table 3.

The FT-IR spectrum for semicarbazide derivatives showed to appear two band due to primary amid group (3595-3392), (3394-3300) cm-1, beside secondary amid group which appear (3433-3249) cm-1, ν(=CH) alken appear (3086-3010) cm-1, (ν C-H) aliphatic appear to band (2962-2926), (2860-2818) cm-1, also (C=O) amid group appear (1695-1646) cm-1 and (1600-1608) cm-1 due to (ν C=C) alken, (CH2 and CH3) group appear (1492-1402) cm-1, and (769-750), (754-715) cm-1 attributed to ν (C-C)asy., sym .In addition, a band at (3222) cm-1 attributed to (ν OH) alcohol in [E4] also appearance of bands (3190) cm-1 due toν (C-H)arom., and (1616, 1525) cm-1 due to ν (C=C)arom. in [E5],These results are in agreement with recent literature[14]. As shown in Figure S1 E1. UV and FT-IR spectrum are given in Table 3.

Moreover the 1H-NMR spectra of [E1] Figure S2 shows a clear singlet signal at δ=10.66ppm attributed to –CO-NH and δ =10.37 ppm attributed  to NH- C=O, triplet signal at δ = 7.23, 7.10,6.97 attributed to NH2, triplet signal at δ =5.03, 5.02, 4.93, 4.74 ppm attributed to -CH=CH-, triplet signal at δ =4.74, 4.34, 4.33 ppm attributed to CH2-C=O, multiple signal at arrange δ =4.33-2.01 ppm for CH2 and singlet signal at δ = 2.01 to CH3. As well as signal of DMS0-d6 appear at δ = 2.50, 2.51, 2.52 ppm.

The 13C-NMR spectrum of [E1] Figure S3 shows a clear singlet signal at δ =178.89 ppm attributed to-C=O-NH, singlet signal at δ =152.12 ppm attributed to- C=O-NH2, doublet signal at δ =131.94, 119.34 ppm attributed to- CH=CH-, multiple signal at rang δ=25.50-18.02 ppm due to CH2 and singlet signal at δ =15.87 ppm attributed to CH3.

The 1H-NMR spectra of [E2] Figure S4 shows singlet signal at δ =10.66 ppm attributed to C=O-NH, singlet signal at δ =10.37 ppm attributed to HNC=O, triplet signal at δ =7.23, 7.10, 6.97 ppm attributed to NH2, multiple signal  an the rang 5.03-4.74 ppm attributed to-CH=CH, triplet signal at δ =4.34, 4.33, 3.98 ppm attributed to -CH=CH-CH2*-CH=CH-, also multiple signal at δ =3.58-2.01 ppm attributed ta CH2 group and singlet signal at δ =2.01 ppm attributed to CH3 as well as signal of DMSO-d6 appear at δ =2.52, 2.51, 2.50 ppm.

The 13C-NMR spectrum of [E2] shows singlet signal at δ =167.37 ppm attributed to C=O-NH and singlet signal at δ =155.21ppm attributed to C=ONH2, Doublet signal at δ =132.17, 129.12 ppm attributed to -CH=CH-, singlet signal at δ =61.78 ppm due to CH2, multiple signal an the rang δ =17.90-16.62 ppm attributed CH2, singlet signal at δ =14.35ppm due to CH3.

The 1H-NMR spectra of [E3] Figure S5 shows a clear singlet signal at δ =11.12 ppm attributed to amin group in CH2-CO-NH and singlet single at 10.58 ppm attributed to -CO-NH troubled signal appear at δ =7.26, 7.14, 7.01 ppm attributed to NH2, triplet signal at δ =6.25, 5.83, 4.53 ppm attributed to CH=CH, triplet signal at δ =2.51, 2.44, 2.28 ppm attributed to CH2 and singlet signal at δ =1.24 ppm attributed to CH3. DMSO-d6 signal appear at δ =2.51 ppm.

The 13C-NMR spectra of [E3] Figure S6 shows doublet signal at δ =169.76, 163.40 ppm attributed to -CO-NH, and triplet signal at δ =150.45, 147.28, 145.34 ppm attributed to -CO-NH2 singlet signal at δ =130.11ppm due to HC=CH, triplet signal at δ=79.77,79.44, 79.11 ppm attributed to CH=CHCH2*CH=CH, multiple signals at rang δ=31.15 -16.66ppm due to CH2 and singlet signal at δ =16.41 attributed to CH3 group.

The 1H-NMR spectra of [E4] Figure S7 shows doublet signal to NH group at δ =9.90, 9.71 ppm and doublet signal for NH2 group at δ=8.70, 8.58 ppm multiple signal at ring δ =7.90-7.01ppm attributed to -HC=CH-doublet signal at δ =3.39, 3.37 ppm duo to OH alcohol. Singlet signal at δ =2.29 ppm attributed to CH. multiple signal at rang δ =2.10-1.39 ppm duo to CH2 and singlet signal at δ=0.85 ppm attributed to CH3 as well as signal of DMSO-d6 appear at δ =2.51 ppm.

The 13C-NMR  spectrum of [E4] shows singlet signal at δ =163.02 ppm attributed to C=O-NH and singlet signal at δ =154.17ppm attributed to C=ONH2, Doublet signal at δ =1143.46, 135.41 ppm attributed to -CH=CH-, singlet signal at δ =60.92 ppm due to C-OH, singlet signal at δ =53.21ppm due to CH2, multiple signal  an the rang δ =25.08-16.62 ppm attributed CH2, and singlet signal at δ =16.41ppm due to CH3.

The 1H-NMR spectra of [E5] shows doublet signal at δ =10.91, 10.73 ppm attributed to C=O-NH, δ =10.37 ppm attributed to C=ONH, multiple signal at δ =7.75 -7.61 ppm attributed to CH aromatic, doublet signal at δ =7.68, 7.67 ppm due to NH2 and multiple signal at 6.67 -7.63ppm attributed to -CH=CH- aleph. As well as signal of DMSO-d6 appear at δ =2.57, 2.50 ppm.

The 13C-NMR spectrum of [E5] shows singlet signal at δ =169.15 ppm attributed to C=O-NH and singlet signal at δ =159.08ppm attributed to C=ONH2, multiple signal at δ =133.28-128.80ppm attributed to CH aromatic, doublet signal at δ =127.63, 125.60 ppm due to -CH=CH-.

Characterization of polymers [Ep1-Ep5]

Semicarbazid derivatives copolymers [Ep1-Ep5] were prepared from the reaction semicarbazide derivatives [E1-E5] and malice hydride in DMF with H2O2 as initiator. The FT-IR spectrum showed to appear two band due to primary amid group (3450-3393), (3496-3340) cm-1, beside secondary amid group which appear (3327-3192) cm-1. Beside new bands appear at 1728-1701 cm-1 attributed to the (C=O) of malice anhydride as well as the appearance of the bond at 1116-1105 cm-1 due to (C-O) malic anhydride. The rest of the packages kept their positions as shown in Figure S8 and S9, Ep1, Ep5 and FT-IR spectrum are given in Table 3.

Table 3: FT-IR & UV-Vis data of prepared compounds and Copolymers

Comp.

No.

IR (KBr) cm-1

 

ν

(ΝH2)

Asy.

Sym.

ν

(NH)

ν

(=CH)

Alkene

ν

(CH2)

(CH3)

Alep.

Asy.

Sym.

ν

(C=O)

Amid

Ν

(C=C)

Alkene

δ(CH2)

(CH3)

Asy.

Sym.

ν

(C-C)

 

other

λmax

EtOH

E1

3488

3394

3288

3041

2962

2918

1646

1600

1479

1355

769

754

-

246

260

E2

3450

3390

3249

3016

2948

2858

1695

1608

1456

1367

763

727

-

254

250

260

E3

3495

3450

3433

 

3086

2926

2860

1674

1600

1452

1367

750

715

-

250

260

280

E4

4360

3420

3250

3018

2927

2850

1697

1608

1464

1370

763

721

ν O-H Alcohol

3222

251

265

E5

3392

3300

3288

3010

2928

2854

1690

1600

1492

1381

769

719

ν C-H Ar.

3190

ν C=CAr.

1616

1525

278

CoPoly No.

IR (KBr) cm-1

ν

(ΝH2)

Asy.

Sym.

ν

(NH)

ν

(CH2)

(CH3)

Alep.

Asy.

Sym.

ν

(C=O)

Acid

δ (CH2)

(CH3)

Asy.

Sym.

Ν

(C-O)

other

Ep1

3414

3373

3327

2912

2850

1722

1460

1373

1114

-

Ep2

3433

3340

3271

2995

2880

1718

1450

1396

1105

-

Ep3

3450

3496

3271

2926

2850

1701

1421

1380

1105

-

Ep4

3417

3394

3265

2924

2840

1730

1450

1370

1116

OH alcohol 3433

Ep5

3394

3350

3192

2930

2835

1728

1460

1367

1114

C=C Aromatic. 1631,1595,1458

 

Thermal characterization of copolymers [Ep2-Ep5]

The thermal behavior data of copolymers [Ep2-Ep5] is summarized in Table 5. Thermogram of [Ep3] show a broad single stage weight loss because of linkages in its structure. Is higher than other copolymers that may emanate from higher cross linking in copolymer backbond (Figure S11). Thermogram of [Ep4] show a double stage weight loss because of double bond and OH alcohol in its structure that come from cross linking in copolymer bacbbond (Figure S12). Thermograms of [Ep2] and [Ep3] have three and four stage decomposition straight in the rate of 97.33%, 89.57%. Char yield of Ep2 is higher than other copolymers (Figure S10 and S13).

Also the prepared copolymers showed good thermal stability through their thermal analysis, softening points and this due to the presence of semicarbazide and fatty acids and malic anhydride in their repeating units since insertion of these components in copolymeric chains exhibit the copolymer good thermal and chemical stability.

 

Table 4: 1H&13C data of prepared compounds [E1-E5]

Comp. No.

 

E1

1H

1H-NMR Spectrum, δppm, 300HZ, δ40 (DMSO-d6), 10.66 (1H, NH), 10.37 (1H, NH), 7.23, 7.10, 6.97 (2H, NH2), 5.03-4.74 (4H, CH=CH), 4.74, 4.33 (3H, CH2C=O), 3.96, 3.58 (28H, CH2), 1.01 (3H, CH3).

13C

13C-NMR Spectrum, δppm, 300HZ, δ40 (DMSO), 178.89 (O=C-NH), 152.12 (O=C-NH2) 131.94, 119.34 (C=C), 25.50-18.02 (CH2), 15.87 (CH3).

E2

1H

1H-NMR Spectrum, δppm, 300HZ, δ40 (DMSO-d6), 10.66 (1H,NH-C=O), 10.37 (1H,NH-C=O), 7.23, 7.10, 6.97 (2H, NH2), 5.03-4.74 (CH=CH), 4.34, 4.33, 3.98 (2H, CH2), 3.58, 2.01 (22H, CH2), 2.01 (3H, CH3), (28H, CH2), 1.01 (3H, CH3).

13C

13C-NMR Spectrum, δppm, 300HZ, δ40 (DMSO), 167.37 (O=C-NH), 155.21 (O=C-NH2), 132.17, 129.12 (C=C), 61.78 (CH2), 17.90-16.62 (CH2), 14.35 (CH3).

E3

1H

1H-NMR Spectrum, δppm, 300HZ, δ40 (DMSO-d6), 11.12(1H, NH), 10.58 (1H, NH-C=O), 7.26, 7.14, 7.01 (2H, NH2), 6.25, 5.83, 4.53 (22H, CH2-CH=CH), 2.51, 2.44, 2.28 (2H, CH2), 1.24 (3H, CH3).

13C

13C-NMR Spectrum, δppm, 300HZ, δ40 (DMSO), 169.76, 163.40 (O=C-NH), 150.45, 147.28, 145.34 (O=C-NH2), 130.11 (C=C), 79.77, 79.44, 79.11 (CH=CH-CH2*-CH=CH), 31.15-16.66 (CH2), 16.41 (CH3).

E4

1H

1H-NMR Spectrum, δppm, 300HZ, δ40 (DMSO-d6), 9.90,(1H, NH), 9.71 (1H, NH), 8.7,  8.58, (2H, NH2), 7.90, 7.01 (2H, CH=CH), 3.39, 3.37 (1H, OH), 2.92 (1H, CH), 2.10-1.39 (15H, CH2), 0.85 (3H, CH3).

13C

13C-NMR Spectrum, δppm, 300HZ, δ40 (DMSO), 163.02, (O=C-NH), 154.17, (O=C-NH2), 143.46, 135.41 (C=C), 60.92 (C-OH), 53.21 (CH2), 25.08-16.62 (CH2), 16.41 (CH3).

E5

1H

1H-NMR Spectrum, δppm, 300HZ, δ40 (DMSO-d6), 10.91, (1H, NH), 10.73 (1H, NH), 7.75-7.71 (5H, CH-Ar), 7.68, 7.67, 7.65-6.97 (2H, CH=CH).

13C

13C-NMR Spectrum, δppm, 300HZ, δ40 (DMSO), 169.15 (O=C-NH), 159.08, (O=C-NH2), 133.28-128.80 (C-HArom.), 127.63, 125.60 (C=C).

 

Table 5: Thermal properties of copolymers [Ep2-Ep5]

CoPoly.

Step

TG%

Ti Co

Tf Co

Wt loss %

Ep2

1

25

230

6.165

2

230

350

34.66

3

350

600

56.51

Ep3

1

25

600

80.58

Ep4

1

250

290

33.07

2

290

600

12.87

Ep5

1

25

150

3.655

2

150

225

10.37

3

225

350

70.53

4

350

600

5.027

 

Antibacterial activity

The effect of the prepared compounds [Ep1-Ep5] on the growth of bacterla, namely Staphylococcus auras, Staphylococcus staprophyticus gram (+ve), Proteus gram (-ve). Antibacterial activity of the prepared compounds were studied and the results showed that some of the prepared compounds possess good antibacterial activity .The results of in hibition zone diameter (IZD) in millimeter are shown in Table 5 [16].

Table 6: Growth inhibition zone diameter (mm) of seven heterocyclic compounds against two pathogenic bacteria species

Comp. No.

Conc. (mg/mmol)

Staphylococcus auras

Staphylococcus saprophytic

Protes

P1

0.01

17

20

11

0.001

14

14

13

0.0001

19

13

16

P2

0.01

20

15

12

0.001

23

25

14

0.0001

20

20

11

P3

0.01

25

10

31

0.001

22

14

28

0.0001

25

10

29

P4

0.01

21

14

21

0.001

23

19

20

0.0001

27

14

24

P5

0.01

21

14

19

0.001

22

17

21

0.0001

21

10

16

Ep1

 

 

0.01

20

21

16

0.001

24

20

18

0.0001

21

25

15

Ep2

0.01

21

15

10

0.001

21

21

11

0.0001

20

25

10

Ep3

0.01

23

24

21

0.001

18

25

19

0.0001

22

25

23

Ep4

 

0.01

26

16

21

0.001

23

10

19

0.0001

16

15

20

Ep5

0.01

11

14

27

0.001

26

15

26

0.0001

15

21

30

Amoxicillin

0.01

12

11

15

0.001

13

14

10

0.0001

14

13

11

Ampicillin

0.01

22

22

23

0.001

23

21

33

0.0001

44

24

40

Ciprofluxacin

0.01

20

21

23

0.001

36

26

41

0.0001

34

30

43

Blank dish

0.01

0

0

0

0.001

0

0

0

0.0001

0

0

0

 

Conclusion

The aim of the research was to preparation of some new compounds and polymers for some fatty acids and study of their thermal stability, which showed high stability. The antibacterial activity of all of the synthesized compounds [E1-EP5] was tested in vitro. It showed good activity against selected gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

 

Authors' contributions

All authors contributed toward data analysis, drafting and revising the paper and agreed to responsible for all the aspects of this work.

 

Conflict of Interest

Authors have declared that they have no known competing financial interests or non-financial

 

ORCID:

Iman Aywob Yass

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9796-3983

HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE

Iman Aywob Yass. Preparation and Characterization and Thermal Study of New Copolymers of Semicarbazide and Fatty Acids Derivatives with Malic Anhydride and Assess their Biological Activity, J. Med. Chem. Sci., 2022, 5(7) 1347-1356

https://doi.org/10.26655/JMCHEMSCI.2022.7.23

URL: http://www.jmchemsci.com/article_155761.html

  1. Nayak P.L., Natural oil-based polymers: opportunities and challenges. Journal of Macromolecular Science, Part C: Polymer Reviews, 2000, 40:1 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
  2. de Espinosa L.M., Meier M.A., Plant oils: The perfect renewable resource for polymer science?!. European Polymer Journal, 2011, 47:837 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
  3. Warwel S., Brüse F., Demes C., Kunz M., gen Klaas M.R., Polymers and surfactants on the basis of renewable resources. Chemosphere, 2001, 43:39 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
  4. Lattmann B.H., Lunelli C.E., Scremin D.M., Padilha B., Trindade E.M., Zawadzki S.F., Synthesis and Characterization of Modified Polystyrene with Oleic Acid and an Allyl Ester Derivative. Materials Research, 2019, 22 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
  5. Darwees M.F., Molecular Characterization of ESBL Gene in Citrobacter Spp and Antibacterial Activity of Omega-3 Against Resistant Isolates. Acta Environmentalica Universitatis Comenianae, 2016 24:5 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
  6. Hady A.A., Darweesh M.F., Motar A.A., The antibacterial of essential fatty acid semicarbazide extracted from flaxseed oil against some nosocomial infection bacteria in Iraq. International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research, 2017, 8:31 [Google Scholar], [PDF]
  7. Darweesh M.F., Molecular characterization of ESBL gene in Citrobacter spp. and antibacterial activity of omega-3 against resistant isolates. Current Issues in Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, 2017, 30:156 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
  8. Chen L., Deng H., Cui H., Fang J., Zuo Z., Deng J., Li, Y., Wang X., Zhao L., Inflammatory responses and inflammation-associated diseases in organs. Oncotarget, 2018, 9:.7204 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
  9. Goyal A., Sharma V., Upadhyay N., Gill S., Sihag M., Flax and flaxseed oil: an ancient medicine & modern functional food. Journal of food science and technology, 2014, 51:1633 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
  10. Fritsche K.L., Anderson M., Feng C., Consumption of eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid impair murine interleukin-12 and interferon-γ production in vivo. The Journal of infectious diseases, 2000, 182:S54 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
  11. Elagbar Z.A., Naik R.R., Shakya A.K., Bardaweel S.K., Fatty acids analysis, antioxidant and biological activity of fixed oil of Annona muricata L. seeds. Journal of Chemistry, 2016, 2016 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
  12. Ahmed N., Barrow C.J., Suphioglu C., Exploring the effects of omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids on allergy using a HEK-blue cell line. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2016, 17:220 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
  13. Lu Y., Chen Y., Wu Y., Hao H., Liang W., Liu J., Huang R., Marine unsaturated fatty acids: structures, bioactivities, biosynthesis and benefits. RSC Advances, 2019, 9:35312 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
  14. Nuerxiati R., Wubulikasimu A., Mukhamedov N., Mirzaakhmedov S., Gao Y., Aisa H., Yili A., Biological Activity of Fatty Acids from Lipids of Orchis chusua. Chemistry of Natural Compounds, 2021, 57:230 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
  15. Kaseke T., Opara U.L., Fawole O.A., Fatty acid composition, bioactive phytochemicals, antioxidant properties and oxidative stability of edible fruit seed oil: Effect of preharvest and processing factors. Heliyon, 2020, 6:e04962 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
  16. Kumar N.G., Contaifer D., Madurantakam P., Carbone S., Price E.T., Van Tassell B., Brophy D.F., Wijesinghe D.S., Dietary bioactive fatty acids as modulators of immune function: implications on human health. Nutrients, 2019, 11:2974 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
  17. Koch E., Hopmann C., Fröhlich L.F., Schebb N.H., Fatty acid and oxylipin concentration differ markedly between different fetal bovine serums: A cautionary note. Lipids, 2021, 56:613 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]‏
  18. Borhade S., Studies of Omega-3 Fatty Acid Semicarbazide Derivative of Natural Seed Oil. International Journal of Development Research, 2014, 4:1428 [PDF]
  19. Xia Y., Quirino R.L., Larock R.C., Bio-based thermosetting polymers from vegetable oils. Journal of Renewable Materials, 2013, 1:3 [Google Scholar], [Publisher]‏
  20. Wijayapala R., Mishra S., Elmore B., Freeman C., Kundu S., Synthesis and characterization of crosslinked polymers from cottonseed oil. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2019, 136:47655 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]‏
  21. Koivu K.A., Sadeghifar H., Nousiainen P.A., Argyropoulos D.S., Sipilä J., Effect of fatty acid esterification on the thermal properties of softwood kraft lignin. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2016, 4:5238 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]‏
  22. Gan H., Hutchinson S.A., Hurren C., Liu Q., Wang X., Long R.L., Effect of oleic purity on the chemical structure, thermal and rheological properties of bio-based polymers derived from high oleic cottonseed oil via RAFT polymerization. Industrial Crops and Products, 2021, 171:113882 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]‏
  23. Lomège J., LapinteV., Negrell C., Robin J.J., Caillol S., Fatty acid-based radically polymerizable monomers: From novel poly (meth) acrylates to cutting-edgeproperties. Biomacromolecules, 2018, 20:4 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]‏
  24. Al-Ahmed A., Sarı A., Mazumder M.A.J., Salhi B., Hekimoğlu G., Al-Sulaiman F.A., Thermal energy storage and thermal conductivity properties of fatty acid/fatty acid-grafted-CNTs and fatty acid/CNTs as novel composite phase change materials. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10:1 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]‏
  25. Yang L., Zhang N., Yuan Y., Cao X., Xiang B., Thermal performance of stearic acid/carbon nanotube composite phase change materials for energy storage prepared by ball milling. International Journal of Energy Research, 2019, 43:6327 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]‏
  26. Wang J., Xie H., Xin Z., Li Y., Increasing the thermal conductivity of palmitic acid by the addition of carbon nanotubes. Carbon, 2010, 48:3979 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]‏
  27. Yang L., Cao X., Zhang N., Xiang B., Zhang Z., Qian B., Thermal reliability of typical fatty acids as phase change materials based on 10,000 accelerated thermal cycles. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2019, 46:101380 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]‏
  28. Zarski A., Bajer K., Zarska S., Kapusniak, J., From high oleic vegetable oils to hydrophobic starch derivatives: I. Development and structural studies. Carbohydrate polymers, 2019, 214:124 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]‏
  29. Steiner J., Alaneed R., Kressler J., MäderK., Fatty acid-modified poly (glycerol adipate) microparticles for controlled drug delivery. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology, 2021, 61:102206 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]‏‏
  30. Sharif I., Farooq J., Chohan S.M., Saleem S., Kainth R.A., Mahmood A., Sarwar G., Strategies to enhance cottonseed oil contents and reshape fatty acid profile employing different breeding and genetic engineering approaches. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2019, 18:2205 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]‏‏
  31. Lacerda T.M., Gandini A., The cationic polymerization of tung oil and its fatty-acid methyl ester. Industrial Crops and Products, 2020, 157:112886 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]‏‏
  32. Biermann U., Bornscheuer U.T., Feussner I., Meier M.A., Metzger J.O., Fatty acids and their derivatives as renewable platform molecules for the chemical industry. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2021, 60:20144 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]‏‏
  33. Piccini M., Leak D. J., Chuck C. J., Buchard A. Polymers from sugars and unsaturated fatty acids: ADMET polymerisation of monomers derived from D-xylose, D-mannose and castor oil. Polymer Chemistry, 2020, 11:2681 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]‏‏‏
  34. Brandolese A., Della Monica F., Pericàs M.À., Kleij A.W., Catalytic Ring-Opening Copolymerization of Fatty Acid Epoxides: Access to Functional Biopolyesters. Macromolecules, 2022, 55:2566 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]‏‏‏
  35. Cabral T.O., Sarrouh B., Naves F.L., Lofrano R.C.Z., Insights on the preparation and characterization of the poly (glycerol-co-malic acid) from renewable sources. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2020, 22:735 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]‏‏‏
  36. Loutelier‐Bourhis C., Zovi O., Lecamp L., Bunel C., Hubert‐Roux M., Lange C.M., Mechanistic study of maleic anhydride grafting onto fatty double bonds using mass spectrometry. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 2012, 26:1265 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]‏‏‏
  37. Boboqulova F., Maksumova O., Technology of products of interaction of oleic acid and maleic anhydride. EPRA International Journal of Research & Development (IJRD), 2021, 6:1 Google Scholar], [PDF]‏‏‏
  38. Al-Sabagh A.M., El-Hamouly S.H., Khidr T.T., El-Ghazawy R.A., Higazy S.A., Preparation the esters of oleic acid-maleic anhydride copolymer and their evaluation as flow improvers for waxy crude oil. Journal of dispersion science and technology, 2013, 34:1585 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]‏‏‏
  39. Molina P., Arques A., Cartagena I., Noguera, J.A., Valcarcel M.V., Reaction of 3‐hetero‐substituted 2‐phenyl‐4‐thioxo‐3, 4‐dihydro‐quinazolines with acyl chlorides and phenacyl bromides. Journal of Heterocyclic Chemistry, 1983, 20:983 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]‏‏‏
  40. Pyriadi T.M., Hamad A.S., Preparation of new copolymers of vinyl acetate and N-substituted maleimides. Polymer, 1996, 37:5283 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]‏‏‏
  41. Yass I.A., Ayed N.J., Synthesis and Characterization of New Compounds of Amic Acid and Imides Derived from Oleic Acid and Evaluation of Their Biological Activity. Journal of Education and Scientific Studies, 2020, 5 [Google Scholar], [Publisher]‏‏‏
  42. Al-Azzawi A.M., Yaseen H.K., Synthesis, characterization and polymerization of new maleimides. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 2016, 8:241 [Google Scholar]
  43. Ivanišová E., Frančáková H., Ritschlová P., Dráb Š., Solgajová M., Tokár M., Biological activity of apple juice enriched by herbal extracts. Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Food Sciences, 2021, 2021:69 [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]‏‏‏